“How the banks steal from you right under your nose… Legally”
Glen from the RBA is trying his best, cutting rates and trying to light a spark under consumer spending, the banks are taking the opportunity to line their pockets quite nicely, thank you very much. It's a cosy cartel that's putting Aussie investors out of pocket and putting a drag on the whole economy… Burn the banks I say.
Is anyone else getting tired of the banks crying poor? As Aussie investors etched out modest returns where they could over the past few years, the banks continued to post record profits… I've got no problem with that, business is business… But they continue to tell us that conditions are “too tough” to pass on RBA rate cuts in full.
Come on, who do they think they are kidding?
I know the banks can make for an easy target. And I'd be the last person to complain about honest businesses doing all they can to turn a profit. But it leaves a bad taste in my mouth to see them taking us for a ride….and blatantly stealing from me and you.
They secured a number of favourable concessions for themselves in the fall-out of the GFC, knowing that the economy is hamstrung with its financial sector. But now that things have turned in their favour again, that sense of civic duty seems to have gone out the window.
How this legal cartel steals billions from investor…
The RBA cut official interest rates by 25 basis points in December. The majors (CBA, ANZ, NAB and Westpac) passed on just 20 basis points, some of them dragging their heels about it. Since the current rate-cutting cycle began in November 2011, the RBA has cut rates by 175 basis points. The majors have, on average, knocked just 136 basis points of the Standard Variable Rate, pocketing 39 basis points for themselves.
Make sense?
In dollar terms, with an average home loan of around $400,000, a 0.39% difference is roughly about $1,560 per annum.
…oh, and the typical life of the loan is around 25 years… so that number could be $39,000.
Personally, I'd rather that sum be in my pocket that the evil cartel's.
Sure, there are many variables that would effect the actual amount, principle and interest payments, the diminishing balance, blah blah blah…
But stealing is stealing… whether it's $10 or $1,000, the amount doesn't matter… it's a bloody crime and no one is doing anything about it.
What's their excuse this time?
The banks are still pointing the finger at the cost of funds. For most of last year it was the cost of wholesale funding on international markets. As banks, and even governments the world over started to look shaky, as Greek civilisation teetered at the brink of collapse, capital on global markets started to dry up. The major banks in particular depended heavily on off-shore markets, and the cost of funds was going through the roof.
In response, the banks tried to insulate themselves from global markets by coming home to faithful depositor funding – the money Aussies have got stashed in the bank for a rainy day. But then wouldn't you know it, all that competition for deposits forced them into offering savers a better rate, which in term ratcheted up the cost of capital again.
On the face of it, the cost of depositor capital is the principle reason why the banks held on to some of that December rate cut. “Our overall cost of funds remains elevated due to the competitive pressures for customer deposits,” Westpac spokesman Paul Marriage said. “This is unlikely to change,” he warned.
Basically, “Get stuffed, we're keeping the money. Get used to it.”
Something Doesn't Add Up – Wholesale Funding Makes a Comeback
But hang on a sec. Something's a bit off here. If it was the international capital market that forced the banks back into the arms of depositors, hasn't the international situation improved?
It has.
A lot.
International capital markets are a lot calmer now than they were a year ago, and the cost of capital is falling. It's saving the banks a fortune.
For example, in January of last year, the CBA borrowed $3.5 bn for 5 years at a rate 175 basis points above the bank swap rate. This year, in a similar deal the CBA ran away with a rate just 50 basis points above the swap rate.
125 basis points on a loan like that is not to be sneezed at.
Should I need to do the Math again…not really, just triple the figures I mentioned above…ouch now that really hurts…
But, it gets worse…the average investor would have millions in borrowed money…
Triple again and then some… I did my own calculation based on my borrowings.
OMG… I need a scotch (bottle) and a lie down.
The Australian also reported that the CBA has plans to retire early about $5bn worth of government guaranteed funding (itself a massive windfall for the banks) and go back to the market and refinance it all at lower cost.
So this story about the cost of capital still hurting the banks starts to ring a little hollow. In fact ING passed on the last two rate cuts in full. According to their CFO Glenn Baker, they could do this because, “the cost of new wholesale money dropped significantly over the year and the cost… continues to decline.”
Good on you, Glen…
More Than Just Money At Stake
So enough with the crying poor. Banks are currently enjoying the best conditions since the onset of the GFC. It's time they let Australian businesses and investors have their time in the sun too.
In fact, I agree with Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry CEO, Peter Anderson. He went on the attack last week, saying, “in the current circumstances, with global funding costs easing, the banking industry should look to reduce rates outside of the normal cycle.”
….in laymen terms, what Peter is saying… “Hey, we know you are pinching from the cookie jar, stop doing and give the money back you #%$@…”
He's right. There's more at stake here than just the banks bottom line. It goes to the heart of small business funding, new home-ownership and the ability of investors to secure adequate rewards for the risks they take.
Some hard-liners would say that we've got no place telling banks how to run their business. But you can't have it both ways. You can't leverage off the central role of finance in the economy to secure concessions for yourself – profitable concessions such as government guaranteed funding, or a cave-in on the use of covered bonds for example – while defending your right to be an unfettered participant in the market.
Australians deserve and expect better. It's time for the banks to start doing their bit.
So what can you do about it?
Glad you asked.
Play them off against each other…
One thing is for sure with cartel or mafia style organisations… Loyalty to each other is not their strong suit. They want your business and they want it badly.
Whilst times ARE good, they know that it's been, a lot better.
Mortgage and borrowing numbers are significantly down since the heady days of 2004 and they know it.
THE STING:
Get a rate from one bank and then walk out the door and into the next bank and ask them to beat it… you will be surprised how accommodating they will be…
If you already have a few loans currently, shop them around as well.
I did this exact thing recently with my bank. I went to an opposing bank, told them how much I wanted to borrow, they gave me a crazy rate. I went back to my bank and not only did they match it, but they beat it by a couple of points.
The rate that I eventually got them down to was 5.5% – and that's for an investment loan.
You probably want to know which bank, right?
ANZ…but that's not the point…
You may or may not get the same rate as me…but l will guaranteed you, if you ask you will save/make money…thats for sure.
You've got nothing to lose….more money to gain.
Go for it…
A very well written article, I agree with most of the things you point out.
I think the education system should make the lowest maths subject, for year 11 & 12, compulsory. This should hold even for the scientists and mathematicians, calculus and differential equations, do not teach people how to calculate an interest change in a mortgage. These are the things the lower maths subject teaches, even including what a tax form looks like.
Some of the banks offer nice rates and then we find out about some hidden clauses that are not realised until we are further down the track.
My last point which absolutely amazes me, is how most real estate contracts so easily conceal the fact that, a possible client, coming from one real estate,’ is his’. If someone changes to another real estate, this could consequentially lead to two payments. It is so easy to write this clause out of the initial contract, and I am not a solicitor, however this should not initially be on the contract, even if they give the real estate a time duration for cooling off, before the contract is finally exchanged.
Ciao, Bill
Good article -thanks. Getting more competitive rates is the easy bit..however impossible to switch institutions for current home loans when recently reduced valuations do not support the original agreed LVR of the loan in the case of low doc loans.
Any ideas or tips?
Great article – I’d love to put it on my website with all credits to you of course? Ann
who will challenge the banks when they get 30% of 24 billion
not the government thats for sure
In the years leading up to the GFC the RBA increased official interest rates about 8 or 10 times. Without fail the banks passed on the FULL amount to their borrowers IMMEDIATELY, that is on the same day or certainly the next day. Now, as rates are coming down, the banks take about 2 weeks before they even think about it and when they eventually lower their rates, it’s never the full amount.
Why should we be surprised? That’s what banks have always done and will continue to do.
There is another little known practice in the finance industry that really riles me. When you invest your money with a Managed Fund (and there are hundreds of them), not only are you charged exorbitant fees but you may lose a large proportion of your money. But the real clincher is this: The way the Fund Manager’s (and his assistants’) income is determined. If the stockmarket loses 5 % in one year and the Fund manager (and his assistants) also lose 5 % of your money, they have “matched” the market and get to keep their jobs and their inflates salaries. But if they lose “only” 4 % of your money they are deemed to have “outperformed” the market and are rewarded with millions of dollars in “bonuses”.
And haven’t we seen many Managed Funds post negative returns in recent years?
Hey Jon, great article and so true. The big banks have had it too good for too long and held us all to ransom. But have you forgotten all the other financial institutions out there? i.e. Credit unions etc. CUA offers a great 5.30% on investment or regular home lendings. And the Credit Unions don’t have Shareholders (who the banks blame for having to make huge profits) just members to whom they reward with great SERVICE and give back to their communities.
It’s time to say; “I am not happy and I am not going to take it any more!!!” Give the “big 4” a solid message.
Thanks for your time Jon enjoy the weekend.
X Tricia
Hi Jon Thank you for your excellent article on the banks who are running the country. There is an urgent need for an alternative banking system with 1%loans and no transaction fees. This can be done at a grass roots level. There is a need to break the stronghold of the Bank of England and Wall St. There is a need to reestablish the original Commonwealth Bank set up by OMally. Mike
Hi Guys, whats the lowest interest rate at present for say line of credit and which Bank?
Ed